The Los Angeles Overtime Attorneys | Meal/Rest Break Lawyers at Azadian Law Group, PC are experts in California’s wage and hour laws. Our skilled employment lawyers have handled numerous claims related to failure to pay overtime compensation. There are various ways that employers can cheat employees out of all the overtime compensation they are owed. Some common examples where employees can be owed overtime compensation, include:
Azadian Law Group has some of the best Los Angeles Overtime Lawyers & Meal/Rest Break Attorneys. We offer free consultations to see if an employee may be entitled to additional compensation. When an employee is still employed, we also work with the employee to ensure that their concerns are documented appropriately. Our lawyers often include overtime claims and meal/rest break claims in wrongful termination cases. Our Los Angeles Overtime Lawyers & Meal/Rest Break Attorneys also have incredible experience in class actions related to overtime and meal/rest break issues. We have recovered millions for employees who have been cheated out of overtime or not provided meal/rest breaks as required by California’s Labor Code.
Overtime pay is required by federal and state laws. These laws allow the majority of employees to collect a 50% premium (or “time and a half”) should they work over a certain amount each day or each week, and in some situations a 100% premium (or “double time”).
In some states employers are able to use the tips an employee receives as overtime pay. California law prohibits tips from being used as overtime pay and an employer must pay out overtime pay separately.
Employers who are covered by the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) must pay overtime. Typically a company would be covered by the FLSA if they generate $500,000 annually in sales. California overtime law also protects employees who work for small or family-run businesses.
There are, however, individuals who may not be entitled to overtime pay. Some of the most common include:
Most employees in California are entitled to overtime pay, there are some important exceptions. An “exempt” employee is an employee whose job does not qualify for overtime protections because of the kind of work the employee performs. Just because your employer says you are exempt does not make it true and many employer’s misclassify non-exempt employees entitled to overtime pay as exempt employees. Also, just because you are paid a salary does not automatically make you an exempt employee.
The employer has the burden of proving that the employee was properly classified as an exempt employee. See Martinez v. Joe’s Crab Shack Holdings, 231 Cal. App. 4th 362, 375 (2014) (“Exemptions are narrowly construed and, as affirmative defenses, must be proved by the employer. . . . Moreover, because the elements of the exemption are stated in the conjunctive, all criteria must be established for the exemption to apply.”).
Overtime laws generally do not cover the following three categories of “exempt employees”: (1)Administrative Employees; (2) Executive Employees; and (3) Professional Employees. Each is discussed below
Overtime laws do not generally cover employees who are considered “administrative employees.” To be considered an administrative employee, the following must all be satisfied:
Following are examples of employees who might qualify for the administrative exemption if they meet the criteria set forth above:
In contrast, if the employee has little or no discretion and must follow specific guidelines in performing their duties, they are unlikely to be exempt employee (meaning they should be paid hourly with overtime and not just a salary). For example, in McKeen-Chaplin v. Provident Sav. Bank, No. 15-16758, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11950 (9th Cir. July 5, 2017), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal held that mortgage underwriters at a specific bank should have been paid hourly with overtime. The Court reasoned that the underwriters’ primary duties did not relate to the management or general business of the employer. Instead, the Court found that the underwriters’ duties were “production rather than administrative work.” The production aspect of the job was that these underwriters sold mortgage loans. The Court also ruled that the employees did not have significant discretion in performing their duties because they were required to follow company guidelines to determine if the loan was acceptable from a risk standpoint.
Overtime laws do not generally cover employees who are considered “executive employees.” To be considered an administrative employee, the following must all be satisfied:
Remember, just because your title contains the word “manager” does not mean you are automatically an exempt employee.
Overtime laws do not generally cover employees who are considered “professional employees.” To be considered a professional employee, you must be licensed or certified in:
You must also spend at least half of your work time performing duties that are typical of your profession and must also meet the “salary basis” test, which means that you also must receive a salary that is at least twice the minimum wage for full time work.
Regardless of whether you are a salaried employee or not, you may be entitled to overtime pay if:
In these situations you would be entitled to 1.5x your regular hourly rate.
If you have worked more than 12 hours in a workday, then your overtime rate would be 2x the regular hourly rate.
Calculating overtime pay for a salaried employee is a bit more complicated than a non-salaried employee. To start, convert your hourly rate of pay by taking your weekly salary and dividing it by 40.
Employees who work in California are entitled to a 30 minute meal break after working for 5 or more hours in a day (unless the workday will be completed in 6 hours or less). It is important for employees to note, however, that this meal break is unpaid and therefore those 30 minutes cannot be included when calculating your overtime pay. If the employee does not work more than 6 hours in the day, the meal period can be waived by mutual agreement between the employer and the employee. See California Labor Code Section 512(a)
Recently, the California Court of Appeal ruled that if the employee does not work more than 6 hours in the day, the meal period can also be waived through an agreement between the employee’s union and the employer (the agreement between the union and the employer is referred to as a collective bargaining agreement). See Ehret v. Winco Foods, 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS 708 (Aug. 13, 2018).
Employees are also entitled to a second 30 minute break if they work for 10 hours a day, unless the workday is no longer than 12 hours. The second meal break can be waived by agreement between the employer and employee only if the first meal break was not waived.
A paid meal break is permitted if the nature of the work prevents the employee from taking a break, and all parties agree in a written contract that it will be paid and the contract allows the employee the right to revoke the agreement.
If you are required to be “on call” or carry a phone or pager during your meal or rest period, you may be owed an hour of pay for each meal or rest period. The California Supreme Court recently held that security guards were owed compensation for meal and rest periods where they were required to carry a pager and respond to potential issues, even if they did not receive such calls during each rest period. See Augustus v. ABM Sec. Servs., Inc., 2 Cal. 5th 257, 273 (2016) (during meal and rest periods employers must “relinquish any control over how employees spend their break time, and relieve their employees of all duties—including the obligation that an employee remain on call”).
Depending on the nature of the job, the employer and employee can agree that the employee will be paid for an “on duty” 30 minute meal/lunch period. An “on duty” meal period is allowed under California law only if the type of work the employee is hired for prevents him or her from being relieved of all job duties. Examples of such jobs include an employee who is on a shift alone or a security guard who is working alone. For such an on-duty lunch period there also must be an agreement in writing between the employer and the employee stating that the employee agrees to an on-the-job paid meal period. This written agreement also must state that the employee can revoke the agreement at any time. See Wage Orders 1 –15, Section 11, Wage Order 16, Section 10.
All employees are also entitled to a paid 10 minute rest period for every four hours worked. This rest break is in addition to time taken by the employee to use the restroom. To the extent it is practical, rest break should be provided in the middle of the four hours worked. However, a rest period is not required for employees who work less than three and a half hours in a workday.
Certain potential exceptions also exist for employees of 24 hour care facilities such as nursing homes. Another exception exists for swimmers, dancers, skaters, and other performers engaged in strenuous physical activities who must have additional interim rest periods during periods of actual rehearsal or shooting.
Depending on the number of employees impacted, bringing a wage-and-hour class action may also be warranted for failure to provide compliant lunch and rest breaks.
Courts have routinely certified wage and hour class actions based on an unwritten policy of discouraging meal/rest periods in order to complete work for the employer. For example, in Jaimez v. Daiohs USA, Inc., 181 Cal. App. 4th 1286 (2010), the California Court of Appeal instructed the trial court to certify the class based on the fact that “[t]he delivery schedules made it extremely difficult for [employees] to timely complete the deliveries and take all required rest breaks.” Similarly, in Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC, 267 F.R.D. 625 (S.D. Cal. 2010), the Court granted class certification of a meal-period class and agreed that “to the extent that these policies were informal and enforced through ‘ridicule’ or ‘reprimand,’ they should be provable through common representative testimony.”
In 2012, the California Supreme Court decided the landmark case of Brinker Rest. Corp. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal. 4th 1004 (2012), which found that California employers do not have to police meal and rest periods but the employer must “authorize” the breaks. The Court specifically noted that “an employer may not undermine a formal policy of providing meal breaks by pressuring employees to perform their duties in ways that omit breaks.”
California Courts interpreting Brinker have correctly found that the fact that some employees may have taken their meal/rest break will not defeat a meal or rest period class action against an employer. See Bradley v. Networkers Internat., LLC, 211 Cal. App. 4th 1129, 1151 (2012) (“[W]hen an employer has not authorized and not provided legally required meal and/or rest breaks, the employer has violated the law and the fact that an employee may have actually taken a break or was able to eat food during the workday does not show that individual issues will predominate in the litigation.”)
Employees who believe that they are entitled to overtime generally or premium pay for not being provided compliant meal/rest periods generally have 3 years under California overtime laws to collect overtime pay for the work they performed. This may be extended to 4 years under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL).
Calculating overtime pay and the rules relating to meal and rest breaks can be complex and requesting it from an employer can be intimidating. The Azadian Law Group, PC offers free case evaluations to anyone who is trying to determine their overtime pay and whether or not they are being fairly compensated for their time at work.
As we never charge our clients a penny out-of-pocket, you can rest assured that when we accept a case, we are standing behind our client 100% and will fight aggressively for their rights.